Keepin’ it Literal and Exaggerated, or How the “Truth” Works to Maintain Republican Power

The Comey hearings drew out Republican strategy that should be familiar to anyone who understands how they win elections. And plan on continuing to win. They don’t need the majority, they need their voters to vote. So here’s what they do. They use explicitness—words _said_ that allow them to direct their agenda. Selective literalness...

Continue reading

On The Trump Problem, the Perils of Simplistic Binaries, and How Human Complexity Invites More Constructive Rage.

David Brooks in today’s NYTimes (June 2nd, 2017) writes eloquently about how Trump poisons the world.  I cannot disagree.  But Brooks’s eloquence and pointed criticism of Trump, for all its merits, is also typically reductive.  It’s a feature of David’s thinking that the human world is rooted in some sort of metaphysical moral either/or,...

Continue reading